Minneapolis exceeds peer cities such as Cleveland, Omaha and Wichita in the amount of real dollars and percentage of the respective city budget in Parks and Recreation allocations, however retrenchment has not been considered by the Park Board in recent years.
City
|
Amount allocated to parks in FY 2012
|
Percentage of total city revenue allocated to park system
|
Minneapolis
|
$47.2 million
|
7%
|
Cleveland, OH
|
$34.8 million
|
7%
|
Omaha, NE
|
$31.0 million
|
4%
|
Wichita, KS
|
$13.5 million
|
6%
|
They have consented to freezes in their budgets in recent years, but the Park Board and the City of Minneapolis have made it clear that the parks continue to be a central part of the city's identity, and as such should not be cut back further. In addition, the Park Board's status as semi-autnomous gives it the power of the purse to make revenue decisions outside of the authority of the City Council, which it did in 2013, increasing the local tax levy to help fund priority areas.
Despite (or perhaps, because of) these difficulties, the department has pursued private partnerships with nonprofits and businesses that have helped shore up some of its funding needs and engage in future planning while experiencing this volatility.
With increased help from these partnerships and a concerted attempt at promoting its public value to local taxpayers, the Minneapolis Parks Department can help regain some stability and continue to achieve its goals as the future continues to be volatile, at least in the short term.
No comments:
Post a Comment