The progression of broadband internet
from expensive and isolated to the service standard has occurred rapidly. Broadband
access has become a necessary utility for organizational capacity and economic
development. However, there are many areas of the country that are still
working towards adequate access. Rural communities in particular suffer because
their relatively small consumer markets do not provide a sufficient base for
private firms to recoup initial investment costs. Additionally small
communities offer spatial challenges in that they may be separated from other
markets by greater distances than metropolitan areas.
The following video shows how this challenge has affected businesses along the Gunflint Trail:
The following video shows how this challenge has affected businesses along the Gunflint Trail:
Some efforts to extend broadband to
rural Minnesota have had measurable impacts:
Figure 1 displays how broadband
access in greater Minnesota has grown most dramatically over the past decade. While
this growth is undoubtedly a positive sign, there are still communities with
problems of access.
In west-central Minnesota, the Red River Telephone
cooperative provides high-speed internet to much of the area. The cooperative’s
coverage includes rural residents of Barnesville, but not to citizens within
the city proper. In order to provide web access to all Barnesville residents,
city leadership used a revenue bond to tackle the problem itself. They established
an enterprise account, and installed the necessary wiring and equipment to
provide internet, phone, and television access directly to its citizens. Barnesville
now provides internet service to to 651 residential and business customers, representing
25.4% of the city’s population.
As previously noted, the motivating factor in providing municipal access
was to fill a gap in the internet service provider market. Yet Barnesville also
utilizes revenues from the service to aid in other government capacities. While city’s role in providing
broadband internet is largely fulfilling a market need, the service has produced
a surplus, and is currently budgeted to continue be a potential support for
operational funds.
Of note in table 1 are the
budgeted transfers to the general fund, indicating a planned reliance on the
broadband enterprise fund as a revenue source. This dependence extends to other
enterprise funds as well:
Barnesville has found adequate
funding sources through self-reliance. While comparisons to a large sample of
small communities would be helpful in evaluating Barnesville, the city’s large
number of services typically fulfilled in some capacity by the private sector
appears exceptional.
The city of Barnesville is a case of local
government solving a private market problem. While many small communities rely on
successful partnerships with the nonprofit sector to address the rural web
access challenge, Barnesville internalized the problem and in the process,
created a funding source for day-to-day public activities.
One recommendation
for the city moving forward, is to monitor general reliance on enterprise
revenues. In the event that any given service provided becomes obsolete, or a
private competitor enters the market, it will be important for city leadership
to be prepared for any significant revenue decreases that might result. For the
foreseeable future however, this innovative approach to local service delivery
has put Barnesville in a strong financial position.
No comments:
Post a Comment