The
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy revealed that the poorest 20% of
Americans paid 3.6% of their income in property taxes, compared to 2.7% of
income for middle-income and 0.7% of income for the wealthiest 1% of Americans.
State lawmakers wanting to enact residential property tax relief have two broad
options. The first is across-the-board tax cuts for taxpayers of all income
levels, such as tax cap or homestead exemption, and targeted tax breaks, such
as a property tax circuit breaker.
What is a property tax circuit
breaker?
A property tax circuit breaker
is a tax relief program that aims to reduce the property tax burden for certain
individuals. Its name is derived from an electrical circuit breaker, which
shuts off the electrical current when a system is overloaded. Likewise, a
circuit breaker programs kicks in when a taxpayer pays a high proportion of his
her income on property taxes. Property tax breakers can be used to increase tax
equity as they reduce the property tax burden, measured in relation to
income.
Which states have property tax
circuit breakers and for whom?
As
can be seen in the figures above, eligibility varies by state, but most circuit
tax breaker programs are state property tax exemptions or credits for the
elderly. The eligibility measures vary by state.
Some states employ income brackets or income and wealth ceilings. The complexity of the tax circuit breakers also vary by states. For example, while some
states have simple eligibility features, such as Massachusetts, others like Minnesota
have very complex systems with multiple thresholds varying by income, and other
characteristics such number of dependents.
Are there possible changes to
Minnesota’s tax circuit breaker?
In 2011, the legislative tax conference committee proposed
cutting the state’s renter’s credit by $186 million a year. Under this
proposal, the Minnesota
Budget Project estimated that on average seniors and people with
disabilities would see a decrease in their credit of $190, while other families
would see a decrease of $335. In fact, it was estimated that 72,500 households
would lose their refunds entirely. Governor Dayton vetoed this proposal.
Despite Governor Dayton vetoing the 2011 bills, in this 2013 Legislative Session there are new bills that may affect the property tax circuit breaker. For example, Bill H.F 2 attempts to raise the percentage of rent constituting property tax for the renter property tax refund from 17% to 18%. We will have to wait and see if this bill is passed. One thing is for certain, if Minnesota wants to continue lessening the tax burden on low-income, and elderly households, then it should maintain its property tax circuit breaker or look into other tax relief programs, as tax circuit breakers are only one tool in the property tax relief toolbox.
Note: All images are from the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Despite Governor Dayton vetoing the 2011 bills, in this 2013 Legislative Session there are new bills that may affect the property tax circuit breaker. For example, Bill H.F 2 attempts to raise the percentage of rent constituting property tax for the renter property tax refund from 17% to 18%. We will have to wait and see if this bill is passed. One thing is for certain, if Minnesota wants to continue lessening the tax burden on low-income, and elderly households, then it should maintain its property tax circuit breaker or look into other tax relief programs, as tax circuit breakers are only one tool in the property tax relief toolbox.
Note: All images are from the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
vote
ReplyDeleteVote. Interesting post & policy idea. Good graphics!
ReplyDeleteCongratulations! This excellent post has selected as the Post of the Week!
ReplyDeleteVote
ReplyDeleteThanks for the post and great tips..even I also think that hard work is the most important aspect of getting success.Houston tax services
ReplyDelete